Karl Shultz wrote:
JamesShort wrote:
Screw you guys!

My wife has obviously been out shopping way too long and I'm getting bored

.
EDIT: Ok I won't lie, I just finished reading Chuck Edmonson's "Fast Car Physics" and I've been thinking about how I want to get my Bilsteins revalved

. The beers have probably clouded my judgment about how much rebound damping I can put up with in a daily driven car

.
A shedload of rebound damping can really ruin a DD's ride quality. Like, seriously ruin it.
Signed, the guy who's S2000 lives in the garage most of the time
The thing is, I average 750miles or less a month (commute is 5 miles round trip). My commute (other than my neighborhood) is on perfect asphalt. The only major driving the car will see is to Danville, Sanford, or NCCAR

. For the last 2 months I ran my rear koni's at half stiff and it wasn't terrible and that is about double the rebound damping of the stock rear shocks. I have a FvV curve of the rear Koni's at full soft and full hard is supposed to be 100% (twice as) stiffer than on full soft. I'm thinking of going for 75% of that range (ie the full soft curve times 1.75) and go with that on the Bilsteins. The only thing though is that might be unnecessary as the monotube, high gas pressure Bilsteins can run more bump damping than the twin tubes and still achieve similar results on turn in. However, people sitting in the rear of the car (which is very rare) might not be in love with the damping

.
I'm seeing what Shaikh at FCM thinks

.