⚠ Forum Archived — The THSCC forums were discontinued (last post: 2024-05-18). This read-only archive preserves club history. Visit thscc.com →  |  Search this archive with Google: site:forums.thscc.com your search terms

THSCC Forums

Tarheel Sports Car Club Forums
It is currently Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:10 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Would a Clubman S be that much slower than a Cooper S in DS?
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 7:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:41 pm
Posts: 3172
Location: Seattle, WA
Just wondering. I loved the way Maria's car drove when I got a few rides at the Triad event (awesome brakes and steering feel compared to the WRX). Thought I could trade sally wagon A for sally wagon B :).

_________________
2011/2012 Autox VP
2013/2014.5 President
2013 Top Gun

2015 Fit

22R-EC => 4G63 => D16Y7 + D16Y8 => EJ255 + K24Z2 => K20Z3 + K24Z2 => K24Z2 + M54 => L15B


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 8:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 11:23 pm
Posts: 1331
Location: Probably somewhere near an autocross.
Here's some math you can use.
Both the S and the Clubman S have the same wheel width, F=4' 9.2"/R=4' 9.5". Same hp 181. Same torque.

Here's the differences:
wheel base on the S is 8 ft 1.1 inches
Clubman S in 8 ft 4.3 inches The Clubman is longer=won't turn quite as well.

0-60mph: S=6.6 Seconds
Clubman S= 6.8 seconds The Clubman is slightly slower at launch

Here's the kicker, and I almost can't believe this is correct:
Unladen weight for the S=2,668 lbs. (believable-my N/A is 2,424. I weighed it at NCAC last year.)
Clubman S=3,671

Clubman is a thousand pounds heavier. My guess is that equals SLOWER!

Keep the WRX and buy a *real* Mini.

My source is Mini USA. YMMV :wink:

_________________
SCCA Solo Triad Award Recipient 2014
SCCA HSL National Champion 2012
SCCA DSL National Champion 2013
SCCA DSL National Champion 2014
NCR National Driver of the Year 2012
THSCC Heel of the Year 2011
Former Club Secretary
http://www.petscompanioninn.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:41 pm
Posts: 3172
Location: Seattle, WA
Hmmm, 36XX might be the GVW. I think I saw that the Clubman S was 28XX curb weight.

I knew the wheelbase was longer with the clubman, but I wonder about the degree to which handling is sacrificed.

Anyway, after reading around a bit, seems the Clubman doesn't have THAT much more room compared to the Cooper.

_________________
2011/2012 Autox VP
2013/2014.5 President
2013 Top Gun

2015 Fit

22R-EC => 4G63 => D16Y7 + D16Y8 => EJ255 + K24Z2 => K20Z3 + K24Z2 => K24Z2 + M54 => L15B


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 10:37 pm 
Offline
Pseudo cautious/nervous guy

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 8:05 am
Posts: 733
Location: Rockville, MD
I've driven a Clubman S and a Cooper S back to back (BSing a car salesman on a day off work) and I can definitely say that the Clubman doesn't weigh 1K#s more. The 36XX is definitely the GVWR.

The Clubman is a little more quiet, and not quite as nervous at highway speed. The Cooper wants to turn a little more, and seemed a bit louder. I do agree that from a cargo perspective, the Clubman isn't much bigger than a Cooper. The rear seat, however did seem notably bigger. It might have just been the suicide doors, however.

I think at the local level, a good driver could hustle a Clubman around the cone at a competitive pace to a Cooper.

If regional or national competition is in the future, it is definitely bringing a knife to a gunfight.

_________________
Tom Freeman
'98 M3/4/5 | '93 Spec3 325i | '12 TSX sport wagon | '03 Tahoe
Team Silver Bullets '91 240SX


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:41 pm
Posts: 3172
Location: Seattle, WA
Hmmm, I guess another question would be did BMW 'sissyfy' the Clubman S any? Spring rates, rear sway bar, suspension geometry/adjustability, bushing durometer etc etc. Or is it truly a Cooper S with a slightly longer wheel base.

I think at this point, if I were to make the jump, I'd probably just get a MCS.

_________________
2011/2012 Autox VP
2013/2014.5 President
2013 Top Gun

2015 Fit

22R-EC => 4G63 => D16Y7 + D16Y8 => EJ255 + K24Z2 => K20Z3 + K24Z2 => K24Z2 + M54 => L15B


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:07 pm 
Offline
Not spectacular just decent
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 5:12 pm
Posts: 1213
Location: Heading back to base for debriefing and cocktails.
Either would be faster than the Subaru. :P

_________________
Not spectacular just decent.
I'm not sure what I'm driving.
Maybe an ITR in DS.
Or half-assed STX prepped 330.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:41 pm
Posts: 3172
Location: Seattle, WA
David Spratte wrote:
Either would be faster than the Subaru. :P

Hey now, a WRX on 225mm heat cycled v710s, on $500 koni sports, in his first season on rcomps was only 1.5s slower than you at nationals :).

Anyway, R53 or R56 for D stock? Any major suspension differences? All I've read is about the R56 having aluminum rear LCAs. Seems the R53s are more reliable from a powertrain perspective.

_________________
2011/2012 Autox VP
2013/2014.5 President
2013 Top Gun

2015 Fit

22R-EC => 4G63 => D16Y7 + D16Y8 => EJ255 + K24Z2 => K20Z3 + K24Z2 => K24Z2 + M54 => L15B


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 11:23 pm
Posts: 1331
Location: Probably somewhere near an autocross.
JamesShort wrote:
Anyway, R53 or R56 for D stock? Any major suspension differences? All I've read is about the R56 having aluminum rear LCAs. Seems the R53s are more reliable from a powertrain perspective.


My 2005 Mini went through 3 transmissions. The new ones have the Getrag which seems to be holding up. The older Mini's, however would just bang the rev limiter while the new ones cuts fuel so the engine goes flat. Talking to some Mini guys this weekend in Wilmington, they felt the newer Peugeot engines are better. This I'm just parroting a DS owner and a guy who's looking into running a Mini next year.

_________________
SCCA Solo Triad Award Recipient 2014
SCCA HSL National Champion 2012
SCCA DSL National Champion 2013
SCCA DSL National Champion 2014
NCR National Driver of the Year 2012
THSCC Heel of the Year 2011
Former Club Secretary
http://www.petscompanioninn.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 12:01 am 
Offline
Honda >> Ford
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 1:54 am
Posts: 2052
Gwen Baake wrote:
they felt the newer Peugeot engines are better


Minis are built by BMW with Pigout engines? EeeeeeeU!

_________________
Art McDonald
Premier Amateur #518
2008 Dishman Cup
Pivot Cone Snob

Rodney is a waxer (but in a good way)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:33 am
Posts: 2230
the R56 has bigger wheel wells and can get a little more camber if I'm not mistaken. Also, the torque is significantly greater in an R56. I still like the R53 for its character, but on an autocross course, the R56's are faster.

_________________
2012 MX-5 Sport SUV


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:41 pm
Posts: 3172
Location: Seattle, WA
BriceJohnson wrote:
the R56 has bigger wheel wells and can get a little more camber if I'm not mistaken. Also, the torque is significantly greater in an R56. I still like the R53 for its character, but on an autocross course, the R56's are faster.
So the front camber is adjustable on the struts on the Mini's? Eccentric bolts where the strut meets the knuckle? Or e46 style with slotted strut towers?

EDIT: It's slotted strut towers like the e46.

Brice, what camber can MJs JCW get? How has it been on tires? I know the JCW might be a bit lower than the S so probably has a bit more camber.

EDIT2: Lame, starting in early MY10 MCS, you can't get a factory LSD :(.

_________________
2011/2012 Autox VP
2013/2014.5 President
2013 Top Gun

2015 Fit

22R-EC => 4G63 => D16Y7 + D16Y8 => EJ255 + K24Z2 => K20Z3 + K24Z2 => K24Z2 + M54 => L15B


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:33 am
Posts: 2230
We've never had it properly aligned, but I don't think you can get much more than 1 degree. Maria has like 1.5 if I'm not mistaken.

The JCW car of my wife's generation actually has the same suspension as the stock sport package, no changes there. Its just supercharger upgrades (smaller pulley, some coating on the rotors), mild headwork (and raised rev limiter), intake, exhaust, software, and the big brake kit (which is the standard brakes on the R56). Oh, and you also get screwed into C-stock instead of being allowed to run DS.

_________________
2012 MX-5 Sport SUV


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:41 pm
Posts: 3172
Location: Seattle, WA
Yeah, I think I'm giving up on this :). Can't get LSD on the brand new ones. And finding an 07-09 with LSD, sports suspension and NOTHING else (no moon roof package or heated seats etc etc) is proving to be impossible. Seems that EVERY S has the Premium and Cold Weather package.

So under stock class rules, if I found a MY2010 MCS with an open diff, I could swap a factory LSD into it right since it was an option on the very very early MY2010s?

_________________
2011/2012 Autox VP
2013/2014.5 President
2013 Top Gun

2015 Fit

22R-EC => 4G63 => D16Y7 + D16Y8 => EJ255 + K24Z2 => K20Z3 + K24Z2 => K24Z2 + M54 => L15B


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:42 pm
Posts: 1115
Location: Cary, NC
JamesShort wrote:
So under stock class rules, if I found a MY2010 MCS with an open diff, I could swap a factory LSD into it right since it was an option on the very very early MY2010s?


That would be correct.

_________________
2010 Honda Fit Sport
Couple of bicycles


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 8:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 2028
Location: Raleigh, NC
JamesShort wrote:
Yeah, I think I'm giving up on this :). Can't get LSD on the brand new ones.


I wager the upcoming FWD BMW sub-1 series (0-series) will give you LSD, making some Mini buyers "pay up" for it. meh. Did the DS-winning MCS have a sunroof?

_________________
Steve Carter
1972 Datsun 240Z-- resto pics at http://picasaweb.google.com/srcartermd
2007 GPW Honda S2000-- STR 86


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group